Hi! As to your question. "price for item No. 1 is wrongly put for item No. 2" sounds quite understandable. I am not a specialist in trade but I would say "The price for item No.1 has been (was) wrongly set for item No. 2". Your last expression is incorrect, sorry to say that!
Hi, my friend! Thanks for your reply! Honestly, I am really interested if you mean black horse indeed. Black horse is a horse of black color, nothing more. If I wanted to use a nick, I would choose "Dark Horse" meaning that people know me but they never know what I am up to or what to expect from me. Please, take it easy! I am just interested, that's all I mean. You may ask me any questions, OK?
Thanks for accepting me. I'd like you to knowI can explain vocabulary well enough, but as to grammar, appply to my wife Tanya. I always ask her to correct my articles before having them published, OK? See you on Skype one day
Comments
Dear Black Horse! I can't send you a message because of unknown reasons. So, here is my answer: the preposition FOR is correct
Hi! As to your question. "price for item No. 1 is wrongly put for item No. 2" sounds quite understandable. I am not a specialist in trade but I would say "The price for item No.1 has been (was) wrongly set for item No. 2". Your last expression is incorrect, sorry to say that!
Hi, my friend! Thanks for your reply! Honestly, I am really interested if you mean black horse indeed. Black horse is a horse of black color, nothing more. If I wanted to use a nick, I would choose "Dark Horse" meaning that people know me but they never know what I am up to or what to expect from me. Please, take it easy! I am just interested, that's all I mean. You may ask me any questions, OK?
Thanks for accepting me. I'd like you to knowI can explain vocabulary well enough, but as to grammar, appply to my wife Tanya. I always ask her to correct my articles before having them published, OK? See you on Skype one day