Well, I don't know what others might think about this but from the way I understood the question /sentence, I suppose it means that " Adam might not keep to what people are are thinking about him"
Well, you're still on this topic?
I gave you the answer.
Adam would not be able (conditional tense for "to can", ok?
to live (conditional / past of to want.
up to (to live up to means "at the height of")(his name.)
Adam is a surname and his last name must be prestigious and normally should let us expect much more than he can do.
Got it?
I hope this helpful for you.
Replies
it simply means, when you meet a stranger named michael, what do you think at the first time?
compared to when you meet a stranger named michael jackson, what do you think at the first time? get it?
Pardon me if am wrong.
Doesn't matter if Adam is a name-sake or what is in the name otherwise (may be contextual)
Apparently, Adam would not be able to maintain dignity to his reputed name.
Hi,
Please follow below idioms and try to make sens of it.
1) Keeping my figures Crossed.
2) Leave no stone unturned.
3) i got my fingers burnt
It seemed that his name wasnot consistent with his charecter
I gave you the answer.
Adam would not be able (conditional tense for "to can", ok?
to live (conditional / past of to want.
up to (to live up to means "at the height of")(his name.)
Adam is a surname and his last name must be prestigious and normally should let us expect much more than he can do.
Got it?
I hope this helpful for you.
I don't understand anything from this sentence. You can approach the writers of professional essay writing service. They can clarify your doubt.
the sentence means that the man since the old ages until now give up on humanitarian values...
..for this reason he doesn't deserve to be called the son of Adam.
I think, it represents the Adam's limited capacity to better living.