This is my topic ,please guys support me and do rectify my mistakes.Because i am preparing IELTS exam .so you are suggestion and corrections are precious to me.I am not well with different words.My whole english is natural way but i want to improve with in one month .I hope your blessings and wishes always with me,thanks in advance.
Coming to the discussion topic:
Really Indian team performance is messed up.Especially top order batsmen performance is very clumsy.But according to my knowledge pretty good in fielding and bowling.When top order batsmen falils there is no chance do wonders with lower order batsmen.Anyway DHAWAN played just good but not more ,45 runs is valuable to us,but he have capable to will do more runs.Rohit sharma feel pressure and forget his previous performance,he know AUSTRAILIAN bowling and fielding is woderful,but Rohit our senior player .So his performance degrade in this match.VIRAT KOHLI really they forget their Cricket knowledge.
Here i want to say one sentence
""THERE IS NO BEAUTY WITHOUT INFORMATION"""
Here beauty means not ANUSHKA SHARMA,it means handsome boy virat ,and information means cricket knowledge.After match i just saw viewers opinions and their opinions are like this:
(1)Everyone blame Anushka because virat failed in this match for one and only reason he made relation with Anushka.IS IT CORRECT GUYS?IF IT IS CORRECT THEN GIVE YOUR EXPLANATION WHY ,OTHERWISE WHYNOT?
According to my point of view it is totally messedup ,there is no Anushka fault in his failure .may be his overconfidence or badluck.
(2)Some viewers are say virat kohli played unnecessary shot in that time becuase before that shot he did only one run in 12 bolls ,so their point of view it is blunder mistake.
Others are also think like this"" If suppose after 200 runs he played the same shot everyone say he done good job in this time"",,Hence guys which one correct either shot or not ?
According to my point of view:it is partially fault and partially not.Because 328 runs is high target ,so in that pressure may be he expect that shot important and he guess that is six or atleast four,but unfortuante it is catch. And other point of view it is big mistake because i think so it is not shot ball ,ball already just near bounce .in that time he did differnce that ball.
(3)What about RAINA guys?
He has good capable and wrist power to hit the ball ,but again he was failure at his weakjone ,he know what his weakness but simply he did same job
(4)Really our main belief on DHONI capatancy and his role in terrible situation,i am not talking about his play ,i am talking about his captancy.Ofcoursse he played well agian .Really opponents are so strong and target very hike on that time ,even he didnot use anytricks ,why simply he just follow batsmen order ,he know RAINA has capacity only in last 10 overs to simply use hitting shots in his play..But why DHONI not came in this critical situation.
Guys here which role is fault in DHONI or RAINA?
According to my point of view it is DHONI major fault .may be he just played as a fifth player may be we have chance to get more score or atleast reach 240 before RAINA participation.
(5)Finally what i observe ,in other countries like newzeland and southafrica soandso ,atleast lower order batsmen done 40% good in their batting.But why india lower order batsmen did only 5% or 10%.
Guys is it correct """batsmen only play well and concentration on batting only.And bowlers only concentration on their bowling ,no need on batting"""".If it is correct why oterwise whynot ,give your opinions shortly?
I think it is time to bowlers concentrate atleast 30% on their batting because atleast in critical situation every bowler have minimum capacity to do 10 runs or 20 runs.
Please i request to you all here who are elders or friends or well known english fulent speakers ,just give your opinions and spend your valuable 5 minutes on weak and well wish english learners.This is my strong request ,rectify my blunders and mistakes ,sentence formation ,way of representation etc.,
I am waiting for your comments.
Thanks in advance.