Hi and good morning.
Let's discuss the problem of reducing English as a language. i want to illustrate what I mean:
Are you "FOR" or "AGAINST" such actions in any language? To my mind, when people try to make something easy and short somehow characterize them as lazy, not attentive and again lazy people. Personally I don't like when someone asks me using these reduced words and I usually ignore such messages as "HAI, H R U?" :)
And what is your opinion?:) Thanks.
Replies
I used/use reduced only when I take dictation in shorthand.
Indeed :)
I have already said it is somewhat allowable in chat room (though I again disagree because of the learning point of view).
Is our correspondence with any official be acknowledgeable if writeen in short English. I think they will through it away.
Valentina, your answers smell aggressive :) this is what I don't like here. I believe that personal positions can be described in a nice and funny way :) cheers
_✿HONEY_BÉÉ✿_ said:
_✿HONEY_BÉÉ✿_ said:
Lazy people don't do many actions. they just sit and do nothing. I'd say that a wheel or a chair was invented by a person who loved comfort and wanted to have an ergonomic life ;)
You know, while the hardworking were carrying heavy things on their backs, the lazy invented the weel. While the hardworking were walking for miles, the lazy invented the bicycle and the car. Have you ever sat in an office armchair on weels? Maybe you have such at home? Be sure, it was invented by a lazy person, one hundred per cent! Progress has been made by lazy people.
Reduced language is like LOVE in a JIFFY!
RichardofYork, and I'm against reduced English in private messages when people here try to improve it. It real irritates me and I should ignore such "H R U" and "SUL" and so on :)