The tourist trade is booming. With all this coming and going , you'd expect greater understanding to develope between the nations of the world. Not a bit of it! Superb systems of communication by air , sea and land make it possible for us to visit each other's countries at a moderate cost. What was once the 'grand tour' ,reserved for only the very rich , is now within everybody's grasp. The package tour and chartered fights are not to be sneered at. Modern travellers enjoy a level of comfort which the lords and ladies on grand tours in the old days couldn't have dreamed of. But what's the sense of this mass exchange of populations if the nations of the world remain basically ignorant of each other?
Many tourist organisations are directly responsible for this state of affairs. They deliberately set out to protect their clients from too much contact with the local population. The modern tourist leads a cosseted , sheltered life. He lives at international hotels , where he eats his international food and sips his international drink while he gazes at the natives from distance. Conducted tours to places of interest are carefully censored . The tourist is allowed to see only what the organisers want him to see and no more. A strict schedule makes it impossible for the tourist to wander off on his own; and anyway , language is always the barrier , so he is only too happy to be protected in this way. At its very worst , this leads to a new hideous kind of colonisation. The summer quarters of the inhabitants of the cite universitaire : are temporarily restablished on the island of Corfu. Blackpool is recreated at Torremolinos where the traveller goes not to eat paella , but fish and chips.
The sad thing about this situation is that it leads to the persistence of national stereotypes. We don't see the people of other nations as they really are , but as we have been brought up to believe they are. You can test this for yourself. Take five nationalities , say, French, Greman , English, American, and Italian. Now in your mind , match them with these five adjectives: musical , amorous ,cold pedantic , naive. Far from providing us with any insight into the national characteristics of the peoples just mentioned , these adjectives actually act as barriers. So when you set out on your travels , the only characteristics you notice are those which confirm your preconceptions. You come away with the highly unoriginal and inaccurate impression that , say , Anglo- saxons are hypocrites' or that 'Latin peoples shout a lot.' You only hav to make a few foreign friends to understand how absurd and harmful national stereotypes are. But how can you make foreign friends when the tourist trade does its best to prevent you?
Carried to an extreme , stereotypes can be positively dangerous . Wild generalisations stir up racial hatred and blind us to the basic fact - how trite it sounds!- that all people are human . We are all similar to each other and the same time all unique.
Replies
I like this topic but I'm not totally agree, if the tourist trade is blooming it means that global economy is healthy, as you say, nowadays is not only allowed for wealthy people and I do believe it make people openminded, so let's not focus in stereotypes because ignorance between countries are not the same as years ago.
Travell agencies are companies to make money but why to blame them for "protecting" their customs from the local people? It depends on everyone behaveaur and schedules are necessary unless you travel by your own.
Colonisation is a hard word to define this kind of tourism, I've seen lot of English colonies along the whole Mediterranean Spanish coast and local people don't mind it unless they don't disrupt too much, even I've had some pints in Irish pubs (last time six days ago without going further in Albufeira, Portugal) but obviously I'm not in my environment.
I love travelling and I go abroad whenever I can and it make me uplifted so I don't discriminate people if I'm the tourist or I'm the local people :)
Thanks so much for your entertaining discussion.