ESL Blogs

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil

is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke.

Hello people, if we are people yet. Why I am doubting about it, I will explain now.

I strongly believe that word "people" refers too human being, nowadays I don't know how many of so-called human beings are humans exactly.

Humans are said to be representatives of homo-sapiens race. Others, under homo-sapiens, are called humanoids. 

Ok, here we go:)

Of course, if is rude and very impolite to mock people, calling them "monkeys" or something like this. I just didn't or can't find any other proper word.

I want to share one thing, phenomenon - The Overton Window.

Whats this? Description and history if it you can see by following the link. Simply I can say, it is powerful and extremely effective tool, that can implement and legislate ANY idea in society. Like, nothing is impossible for those, who decided to impletent an idea into society, people's minds, human brain, to make them accept the things that were immoral and against nature at the begining. 

I will just show stages, how its mechanism works:

1. From unthinkable to radical

2. From radical to acceptable

3. From acceptable to reasonable

4. From reasonable to popular

5. From popular to Policy.

----------

Still have doubts that these stages work? Evgeniy Gorzhaltsan, says this Overton Window is "may be more effective than nuclear weapons to destroy human communities".

Evgeny is author of following example, and he took CANNIBALISM as it one of most of unthinkable things nowadays.

First stage: from unthinkable to radical:

Obviously, now the issue of legalization of cannibalism is on the lower level of acceptance in the 'window of opportunities' of Overton, since society considers it as absurd and unthinkable, a taboo.

It is possible to change this perception by transferring the matter to the scientific sphere, as for scientists usually there is no taboo subjects. An ethnological symposium about exotic rituals of polynesian tribes can be used to discuss the history of the subject of study and obtain authoritative statements about cannibalism, and then ensuring the transition from negative and uncompromising attitude of society to a more positive attitude.

Simultaneously, you must create a radical group of cannibals, although they exist only in the Internet, they will surely be cited by numerous media outlets. As a result of the first stage of Overton, the taboo disappears and unacceptable issue begins to be discussed.

Second stage: from radical to acceptable:

At this stage, one should continue quoting scientists, arguing that no one can say that has no knowledge about cannibalism, as if someone refuses to talk about it will be considered a hypocritical bigot.

By condemnming the intolerance, it is also necessary to create a euphemism for the phenomenon itself and thus separate the word from its meaning. Thus, cannibalism becomes 'anthropophagy' and later in 'anthropophilic'.

In parallel, one can establish a precedent of reference, historical, mythological, contemporary or simply invented, but the most important is to be legitimized, so it can be used as proof that anthropophily principle can be legalized.

Third stage: from acceptable to reasonable:

For this step it is important to promote ideas such as the following: "the desire to eat people are genetically justified," "sometimes a person has to resort to this, if in favorable circumstances" or "a free man have the right to decide what to eat."

Real opponents to these concepts, ie, people who do not want to be indifferent to the problem, deliberately convert to public opinion in radical enemies whose role is to represent the image of crazy psychopaths, aggressive opponents of anthropophily clamoring to burn cannibals alive, along with other representatives of minorities .

Experts and journalists show that during this stage of human history there have always been times when people ate each other, and that this was normal .

Fourth stage: from reasonable to popular:

The media, with the help of well-known people and politicians are already talking openly about anthropophily. This phenomenon begins to appear in movies, lyrics of popular songs and videos. At this stage, begins the promotion of historical characters who practiced anthropophily.

To justify to the proponents of legalization of the phenomenon, it can be appealed to the humanization of criminals by creating a positive image of them saying, for example , that they are victims, because life forced them to practice anthropophily.

Fifth stage: from popular to political:

This stage is the preparation of legislation to legalize the phenomenon. Pressure groups are consolidated in power and publish research that supposedly confirm a high percentage of supporters of the legalization of cannibalism in society. In the public consciousness establishes a new dogma: "The prohibition of eating people is forbidden."

This is a typical technique of liberalism that works due to tolerance as a pretext for prescribing taboos. During the last stage of the 'moving windows' of Overton, from popular to political, the society has suffered a disruption because the norms of human existence have been altered or destroyed by the adoption of new laws.

Evgeny Gorzhaltsán concludes that the concept of 'windows of opportunities', first described by Joseph Overton, can extrapolate ANY phenomenon ....

and is especially easy to apply a tolerant society where the so-called freedom of expression became the dehumanization and where before our eyes removes one after all the other limits that protect society from the abyss of self-destruction.

original text taken from here: 

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2561672/pg1

and also here another good example: 

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/jumping-through-the-overton-window/comment-page-1/

Still in doubts?

Today we are at stage 5 on same-sex marriages, step 3 with regards transgender issues, step 5 children euthanasia, step 2 pedophilia. Yes, and don't be shocked. 

---

Is it not possible in our world?

Let's have some walk:

1. Parents face court action for removing children from gay history lessons

Read more:

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1160067/Parents-face-court-action-removing-children-gay-history-lessons.html#ixzz3AufqBN3r 

2. Gay messages built into school maths lessons for children as young as four years old.

Read more:

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349816/School-children-taught-homosexuality-celebrate-gay-community.html#ixzz3AufwG3wf 

3. Children's euthanasia bill signed by Belgium king 

4.  Motive for the arrest? According to the lawyer, it is only because these students were wearing an “anti-marriage for all” tee-shirt. 

5. France Accused of Police Brutality Against Traditional Marriage Demonstrators.

and for dessert:

6. We'll stop puberty so Tommy can become Tammy: Lesbian couple want to help 11 years old boy to become girl. 

would you be happy to be adopted by such lovely and caring couple?:)

----

About being gay and gay marriages:

For example, in some ancient time countries and civilizations, people were believing in humans as Gods, and done the immoral and things against nature, like killing people in the name of God, cut their hearts alive, worship alive people as Gods, and so on. But in these times, it was ok and acceptable, cuz people believed humans are Gods, etc. So, if I call myself God in that time, noone will blame or kill me. EVen more, people will protect me and my rights.

Today, we consider people's killing as act of terrororism, even cutting heart of alive human is very bad action and surely agaisnt human nature. So, if I call myself God, and order people kill in my name, I will be thrown into jail or mental house. 

Therefore: Why if I say I am Pharaoh, I am taken into mental house. But if I say I am women, my rights are protected.

And maybe, many many years after, future humans will discover our history and ashes, and think about us, like we think today about those people in the past, who believed in Pharaohs, and did immoral things against nature. If they will find my blog, it will be the same, as to find script or piece of pergament 3000 years old, telling that Pharaohs are not Gods, they are just same human beings as we are. And it is always being, that man is man, woman is woman.

Only thing is clear, that this is One way ticket straight to nowhere.

----

Still here are only 2 questions are open for me:

1. What is reason in legalizing all this stuff ( gay-marriages, transgender issue, pedophilia, etc)?

2. Which door gay-lesbian are selecting in public?

(image source:http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AsgJP2d2iKM/UBGTTVL9UZI/AAAAAAAAAes/k5lItOMM_-E/s1600/man-woman-sign.jpg)